<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>VTT on It&#39;s a Binary World 2.0</title>
    <link>https://www.ericsbinaryworld.com/tags/vtt/</link>
    <description>Recent content in VTT on It&#39;s a Binary World 2.0</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:21:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.ericsbinaryworld.com/tags/vtt/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Frustrations With Digital TTRPG Sourcebooks</title>
      <link>https://www.ericsbinaryworld.com/posts/frustrations-with-digital-ttrpg-sourcebooks/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:21:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ericsbinaryworld.com/posts/frustrations-with-digital-ttrpg-sourcebooks/</guid>
      <description> &lt;p&gt;I can’t find the exact blog post, but some time in the last few months I had a throwaway line about how I was a little frustrated in how D&amp;amp;D’s digital assets were handled, particularly the fact that they are tied to platforms. That is to say, if I bought the 2024 Player’s Handbook on Roll20, I wouldn’t also have access to it on DnDBeyond. I think there are really 2 reasons this hasn’t blown up more: 1) many of the platforms only require the DM to purchase content (if it was required of all the players, I think there’d be a revolt) 2) D&amp;amp;D is still primarily an analog, pencil and paper game. That said, this issue has started to become a bit more relevant to me, so I wanted to get some ideas out there (and maybe vent a little).&lt;/p&gt; <p><a href="https://www.ericsbinaryworld.com/posts/frustrations-with-digital-ttrpg-sourcebooks/">Full post</a></p></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
