<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fedora-7 on It&#39;s a Binary World 2.0</title>
    <link>https://www.ericsbinaryworld.com/tags/fedora-7/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Fedora-7 on It&#39;s a Binary World 2.0</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.ericsbinaryworld.com/tags/fedora-7/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>One last, good look at KDE 3 Part 1</title>
      <link>https://www.ericsbinaryworld.com/2008/04/21/one-last-good-look-at-kde-3-part-1/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ericsbinaryworld.com/2008/04/21/one-last-good-look-at-kde-3-part-1/</guid>
      <description> &lt;p&gt;As you can see, &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.ericsbinaryworld.com/category/kde/&#34; title=&#34;KDE Category&#34;&gt;by trawling through this&lt;/a&gt;, I have gone back and forth between KDE and Gnome a lot. As I&amp;rsquo;ve mentioned many times before, I initially loved KDE over Gnome. It looked more like Windows, it had more neat options, and great programs. Not only is Amarok the best media player out there (although Rhythmbox is not far behind), but the KDE programs feel so much more tightly integrated than Gnome. That&amp;rsquo;s one part where they&amp;rsquo;ve always had a huge lead over Gnome, although Gnome has been catching up recently. Still, I hope that KDE continues to evolve its KParts and KIOSlaves infrastructures. (Or whatever they evolve into in KDE4) KDE programs also just seemed to fit together visually so much better, I don&amp;rsquo;t know why because Gnome has the HIG.&lt;/p&gt; <p><a href="https://www.ericsbinaryworld.com/2008/04/21/one-last-good-look-at-kde-3-part-1/">Full post</a></p></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
